Every time time the feds hire another rude, obnoxious TSA agent, or the city hires another jackass clerk or the state hires another pricky, menacing road reaver, a potential insurgent is created. That's what Steven Metz's study published at the Small Wars Journal seems to say.
"Insurgency arises from a combination of two conditions:", says Metz, "significant unmet psychological needs, and the feasibility of violence (via both attitudes receptive to it and the actual tools of armed action). To grapple with this, a psychological conceptualization of insurgency would be more powerful and useful than a political one."
So I gather the boiling frog scenario doesn't always work after all.
"Daily existence is increasingly that of despair, depression, and derangement, punctuated by news of the latest serial murder spree or global eco-disaster, consumed as horrible entertainments in the emptiness." - John Zerzan
Showing posts with label insurgency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insurgency. Show all posts
Friday, January 27, 2012
Tuesday, September 6, 2011
Taliban facing its own "uprising"
In areas of Afghanistan that the Taliban control the local non-Talib tribes are ginning up their own anti-government uprising. What makes this an interesting occurrence is that where this is happening the Taliban is the government. So says the NY Times so these reports are somewhat suspect barring independent confirmation and it may just be the usual tit_for_tat kinda stuff that tribal cultures are known for. But it's a development worth keeping an eye on. (Long War Journal, NY Times)
Labels:
Afghanistan,
guerrilla warfare,
insurgency,
Long War Journal,
NY Times,
Taliban,
war
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)